Jump to content

SRP Billet Intakes


HardIzZlE

Recommended Posts

If your going to get that style of intake where they are seperate then I would get this style from jeff. They have the x in the middle of them.

Intake LINK

39%20intakes.JPG

 

I run a boss racing intake. It is the same price as the ones your looking for. It has a crossover tube machined inbetween the two carbs. Pluse it move the carbs back and up so they dont hit on the clutch lever. Pluse it gets rid of the boost bottle for a much cleaner look.

BossIntake2.jpg

BossIntake1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how does the X in the middle make it better?

& could you give my the link for the boss intakes you use plz thx

 

The x would help keep air flowing straight witch would help increas flow. I doubt you would really notice any performance difference between the vitos with the x and the srp ones.

 

Here is where I bought my boss racing intake. It was from Inland ATV aka In2glamis on ebay. It says 34mm carbs but it works for 33-35mm carbs.

In2glamis Boss Racing Intake LINK

 

Majic Mike on here also sells one that he makes with the crossover machined in. He doesnt have on listed on ebay for 33-35mm carbs. Maybe the smaller one will work or he is has one that is just not listed right now.

Majic Mike's 26mm to 32mm Intake LINK

Majic Mike's 38-40mm Intake LINK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that is just the theory of the designe.

 

I just wanted to make sure what the concept was behind that feature. It certainly directs the the air flow, but it will never increase it. I'm personally a little suspect of the design, but I don't have first hand with the product, so I'll keep my mouth shut. :thumbsup:

Edited by FireHead
Link to comment
Share on other sites

majicmike could get you some billetintakes for any size carbs. They looks really nice on there too.

 

 

Um, I would second that though these intakes will direct flow, they WILL however restrict it. Anything within an air stream will disrupt it to a degree. Also, the more air contact surfaces you have, the more static boundary layers of air you will have. This is basically saying that the air very close to any surface does NOT move and forms a layer of air for moving air to "ride" on. This WILL induce drag and reduce CFM in the intake.

 

Further more, why would you straighten the airflow pattern just before the reeds? The reeds induce air tumble caused by the frequency of the reeds opening and closing. Sounds like another BS product. We might just test that theory on our dyno. Kinda go me thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um, I would second that though these intakes will direct flow, they WILL however restrict it. Anything within an air stream will disrupt it to a degree. Also, the more air contact surfaces you have, the more static boundary layers of air you will have. This is basically saying that the air very close to any surface does NOT move and forms a layer of air for moving air to "ride" on. This WILL induce drag and reduce CFM in the intake.

 

Further more, why would you straighten the airflow pattern just before the reeds? The reeds induce air tumble caused by the frequency of the reeds opening and closing. Sounds like another BS product. We might just test that theory on our dyno. Kinda go me thinking.

 

It's a bs feature of a product to say the least. It sounds like you know what you are talking about in regards to air flow / fluid dynamics. IMO it's not worth testing on anything. If you were to test it, dropping it on a simple flow bench and then doing the same thing with a normal intake would quickly tell the tale. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a bs feature of a product to say the least. It sounds like you know what you are talking about in regards to air flow / fluid dynamics. IMO it's not worth testing on anything. If you were to test it, dropping it on a simple flow bench and then doing the same thing with a normal intake would quickly tell the tale. :thumbsup:

 

 

Oh there is no doubt our flow bench would quickly discredit it in terms of flow. The question is, would the reduction of flow somehow improve performance by more organized airflow to the reeds? I know engines, but I am constantly learning new ways to make HP. I am betting this ain't one of them though.

 

 

Brandon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...