majicmike Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 :ohmy: Oh dam........................... :teehee: they should close this one before someone hurts themself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dajogejr Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 :ohmy: Oh dam........................... :teehee: they should close this one before someone hurts themself Wouldn't help...the little kid will just drag up another old thread, or start a new topic called "Guess my Rectal Size" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireHead Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 Who is cotten eye joe? Nevermind, I like him. He sounds like my kind of guy. Keep it original.. the guy who posted "ojfool".... I mean seriously bro, "ojfool"..... Comon. Take some time to think about your posts. On another note. I see alot of guys asking for the dyno results. Just for the record I never claimed to make a bunch of power. Just that I was going to dyno the thing. As stated before I will be happy if I make 47hp. But I MAY be using the inertia dyno, so of course according to all the mechaical engineers on here I won't know WHAT I made. CottonEyedJoe is the BansheeHQ resident master of MSPaint. Some of his works of art that people may recognize are, as mentioned before, the dyno chart, as well as the corn fed harvest mouse. I am pretty sure I have always attempted to call you by your chosen name (my poor typing aside). I think at this point everyone was just wondering what the bike did on the dyno. I personally did not have any power expectations. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireHead Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 BTW I posted the supercharging effect of the two stroke pipe design... So good job just repeating what I have already said. .. Get your facts strait hommEy. Can we trade out the term "supercharging effect" for "cylinder scavenging"? It would make me alot happier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireHead Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 The crankcase is NOT part of the combustion chamber, it FEEDS the combustion chamber. Kinda like your boyfriend Brian's cock isn't yours...but it feeds you. By the way...I found your dyno chart... Now that's funny. I think I may have pooed a little from laughing so hard. :yelrotflmao: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bansh-eman Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 (edited) BTW I posted the supercharging effect of the two stroke pipe design... So good job just repeating what I have already said. .. Get your facts strait hommEy. OJ you got to be fukin kidding me... you in no way posted correct info on how a 2 stoke pipes design works... the post was made prior to you joining bhq and ranting about nothing...your stupid fukin supercharger comparison is 100% absolutely ass backwards from the function of a 2 stroke pipe... and the reason i post the internal working of a 2stroke in my sig is to give ppl a visual of how it actually works and to clear up the bullshit confusion ppl like you throw out there... so please keep this thread going so everyone new and old to the sight that hasn Edited March 6, 2007 by Bansh-eman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireHead Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 Wouldn't help...the little kid will just drag up another old thread, or start a new topic called "Guess my Rectal Size" I am going to guess the size:............................12? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dajogejr Posted March 6, 2007 Report Share Posted March 6, 2007 Must have really gotten his panties in a bunch. Now the little boy is digging up threads from last year... That's great..... I knew mommy should've gave him his second helping of cheerios this morning.... Ha ha ha ha.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ojcool Posted March 7, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 OJ you got to be fukin kidding me... you in no way posted correct info on how a 2 stoke pipes design works... the post was made prior to you joining bhq and ranting about nothing...your stupid fukin supercharger comparison is 100% absolutely ass backwards from the function of a 2 stroke pipe... and the reason i post the internal working of a 2stroke in my sig is to give ppl a visual of how it actually works and to clear up the bullshit confusion ppl like you throw out there... so please keep this thread going so everyone new and old to the sight that hasn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dajogejr Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 I've decided to give an OJCOOL tribute to being smart and knowing it all... First...off the bat, he doesn't want to waste 4 bucks on plugs...and he even mentions a plug chop. This must be before all his dyno and wideband tuning knowledge came about: http://www.bansheehq.com/forums/index.php?...c=61257&hl= I really have nothing to say here....genius in the making: http://www.bansheehq.com/forums/index.php?...c=52642&hl= Don't know about any of you guys...but I've bought and sold plenty of bikes...I guess I missed out on "the bag of jets a dealer gives you..." Anyone else get this magic bag of beans from Jack and his beanstalk? http://www.bansheehq.com/forums/index.php?...c=66642&hl= This might be my favorite. He calls it "slide and glide" yet....on the side of the tube it clearly says "Anal Lube"...and you know he has stock in that company for investment purposes.... http://www.bansheehq.com/forums/index.php?...c=69014&hl= I take it back, this is even better...he contradicts himself with how "reeds and cages" work. No...OJ, they don't allow more fuel in air in...they don't increase flow...they just act as overpriced reed spacers...what a jack ass... http://www.bansheehq.com/forums/index.php?...c=73342&hl= If you want to bump old posts to the top to make yourself look smart, please be my guest. Anyone can read these classics (I didn't feel the need to go back any further, I proved my point) and see what a dipshit you really are... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bansh-eman Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 The concept is forced induction.. Turbo, Supercharger, makes no difference. The idea is that your increasing the displacement of the engine by more than 100%. That is what makes the power. And that is what I posted. And you know I'm right. If you don't you may want to take a physics course. I am in no way stating that I know everything about two stroke engines. I don't, all I am doing is making it clear what this thread is about. All you guys who are jumping on the bandwagon.. Where were you when we were having a technical disussion? Absent of course. Wideband 02 tuning is far and away a better way to tune ANY engine, than plug reading.. Disagree? Post why? Lets get techinical. See who has something to say and who dosen't. Now start searching the internet and post what you find. once again your solidifying that your a fukin idiot... the concept isn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dajogejr Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 The concept is forced induction.. Turbo, Supercharger, makes no difference. The idea is that your increasing the displacement of the engine by more than 100%. That is what makes the power. And that is what I posted. And you know I'm right. If you don't you may want to take a physics course. Really...must have taken that physics class right after the spelling class.... So...by forcing more air/fuel into the cylinder, you're increasing "displacement" Wow....so my 421 cub motor was actually larger some of the time because the displacement was bigger? Wow...you really are a wealth of knowledge.... firehead hit the nail on the head...scavenging effect...dipshit. Unlike your asshole, It is NOT forced induction.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireHead Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 The concept is forced induction.. Turbo, Supercharger, makes no difference. The idea is that your increasing the displacement of the engine by more than 100%. That is what makes the power. And that is what I posted. And you know I'm right. If you don't you may want to take a physics course. I am in no way stating that I know everything about two stroke engines. I don't, all I am doing is making it clear what this thread is about. All you guys who are jumping on the bandwagon.. Where were you when we were having a technical disussion? Absent of course. Wideband 02 tuning is far and away a better way to tune ANY engine, than plug reading.. Disagree? Post why? Lets get techinical. See who has something to say and who dosen't. Now start searching the internet and post what you find. Yes, let's talk about some of this stuff. :thumbsup: Start a new thread on two stroke engine operating principles and engine tuning instruments and techniques. I would be happy to talk about this stuff in an organzied manner. Plus we wouldn't have to keep draggin this thread out. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireHead Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 and go back to the wideband post... everything was already posted on why wideband isn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bansh-eman Posted March 7, 2007 Report Share Posted March 7, 2007 LOL i like this comment....... I would not say that the "lean is mean" theory is bullshit... well thats funny casue i know without a dought 100% fact that in enduro racing on gokarts... when you hit the front stetch of the nascar track your wide open at about 14,000 rmps and lets see what was it that we did? oh thats right reach down and lean your carbs out .... humm theres also a funny saying.... your bike runs its best when its lean, but not for long??? but yea your right its bullshit hu? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts