rkc Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 (edited) . they just havent found that 'missing link' that would make evolution a truth and not just a theory. a big fan of logic, we have fossil evidence of primiative man. A coupla species actually. But the facts are evolution has a few missing links. So I can't side 100% with the evolution side. I recall hearing that we share 99% of our DNA with Bonobos, meat since Brooke says youre a nice guy....then I'm sure you are. but I too hate the way you pop in every now & then and display a condescending attitude. no offence but you gotta have something going on to be condesending. since you don't ask serious questions why should anybody waste their time answering them,back to your post... do you know that you're quoting Charles Darwin. he was very disappointed towards the end of his life because of the lack transitional fossils. he was confident there would be thousands found in the near future. do you have any idea how much earth has been turned over in the last 120 yrs? Blue Duece is right there should have been millions found. maybe the next generation will find them. infact (since you like facts) when you consider the classification of species and extinct some anthropolgist are/were expecting to find more than "stable" classes. and don't forget lots of Christians believe in evolution and find it satisfying. (I disagee with them, but if I find it proved true I won't miss a step) it's not a litmus test for the existence of God. I also believe in evolution, but delineate between micro & macro. does sharing DNA indicate common ancestry or common designer? Edited November 17, 2006 by rkc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shee-Male Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 ......its all just a bunch of whacky fuckers trying to jamb there shit down your throat.......... Thank you, exactly!! :beer: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master of Faster Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 meat since Brooke says youre a nice guy....then I'm sure you are. but I too hate the way you pop in every now & then and display a condescending attitude. no offence but you gotta have something going on to be condesending. since you don't ask serious questions why should anybody waste their time answering them,back to your post... do you know that you're quoting Charles Darwin. he was very disappointed towards the end of his life because of the lack transitional fossils. he was confident there would be thousands found in the near future. do you have any idea how much earth has been turn over in the last 120 yrs? Blue Duece is right there should have been millions found. maybe the next generation will find them. infact (since you like facts) when you consider the classification of species and extinct some anthropolgist are/were expecting to find more than "stable" classes. and don't forget lots of Christians believe in evolution and find it satisfying. (I disagee with them, but if I find it proved true it won't miss a step) it's not a litmus test for the existence of God. I also believe in evolution, but delineate between micro & macro. does sharing DNA indicate common ancestry or common designer? I know your post was directed at Meat but I just wanted to give my $.02 again. I know we have excavated alot of ground but it does take certain conditions to preserve evidence and we have found some of what appear to be these transitional fossils, what we haven't found is one single shread of physical evidence of many biblical events, in fact I don't think we posess one piece a physical evidence that proves that any events in the bible are true, I know that I've read about how many of these peices of so called evidence are proven fakes. I don't know the particulars of DNA, but I would say that shared DNA would probably indicate a common ancestry, but that common ancestry doesn't necessarily mean shared DNA in all cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shee-Male Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 meat since Brooke says youre a nice guy....then I'm sure you are. but I too hate the way you pop in every now & then and display a condescending attitude. Not just Brooke that say's he's a nice guy, bet you 95% of HQ agrees, he is a nice guy, and ALWAYS stops to help others, he is a BIG contributer to the HQ. How about yourself rkc, you come to bansheeHQ and "pop" in every now and then and spew your religious forcefeedings, and tell meat you should slap his father for raising a coward.....lol, he's the coward? your probably twice his seniour with all your "morals" behind a keyboard calling him a coward hahahaha...come on! I guess it would siut you better if we all just agreed with you huh, shame on us for voicing an opinion. Like it or not, you chemicals to rkc, humans are comprised of over 400 differant species of bacteria, we're a walking ecosystem and the earth is billions of years old, and no matter how much land has been turned up, it dosn't even come close to the ammount that hasn't, most of wich underwater. Hate on rkc, O great contributer to the HQ! I know your post was directed at Meat but I just wanted to give my $.02 again. I know we have excavated alot of ground but it does take certain conditions to preserve evidence and we have found some of what appear to be these transitional fossils, what we haven't found is one single shread of physical evidence of many biblical events, in fact I don't think we posess one piece a physical evidence that proves that any events in the bible are true, I know that I've read about how many of these peices of so called evidence are proven fakes. I don't know the particulars of DNA, but I would say that shared DNA would probably indicate a common ancestry, but that common ancestry doesn't necessarily mean shared DNA in all cases. They recentley found a new dino fossil dating back 80 million years, also found a fossil in the same time frame that they belive to be our ancestors ancestors. These are fossils, not words in a book. Like you said faster, if Christ walked the earth only 6000 years ago, how come we can't find physical evidance? it can't be burried that deep. DNA also proves we didn't all derrive from 1 man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkc Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 (edited) he's a nice guy, no matter how much land has been turned up, it dosn't even come close to the ammount that hasn't, most of wich underwater. if Christ walked the earth only 6000 years ago, DNA also proves we didn't all derrive from 1 man. ok I know someone needs a hug. youre a nice guy too! so all established fossils are just found under dry earth and all the revealing fossils are waiting to be discovered where we can't get to them ok. just like those pesty aliens & big foot just out of our reach.... oh you just wait till the real proof gets here lol. it's been 2000 yrs just curious what physical evidence would Jesus of Nazareth have left and you might as well add Alexander the Great....other than writings you need to read more ,the king of DNA, "The Language of God" by Francis S. Collins Edited November 17, 2006 by rkc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shee-Male Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 poor rkc, still trapped in that box......pitty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkc Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 poor rkc, still trapped in that box......pitty. very rhetorical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shee-Male Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 (edited) very rhetorical :yelrotflmao: , you wanna talk rhetoric....over half of your posts are right here! When "God" gets his ass down here to help tune my banshee a discuss life over a beer, then he'll have my support, until then, it's just a story like all the other religions, tooth fairy, Aliens & bigfoot, I'm still on the fence about Santa though, I remeber sitting on his lap last year and I got exactly what I asked for. :shrug: Edited November 17, 2006 by Shee-Male Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkc Posted November 17, 2006 Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 you wanna talk rhetoric....over half of your posts are right here! news flash! tks, now I can rest easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted November 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 well I finally saw the Da Vinci code, and I still dont see the big deal!! Guess I just wont ever get the whole god thing, oh well no big deal I'll just get back to building my quad :beer: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted November 17, 2006 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2006 According to Genesis 1:20-22 the chicken came before the egg. :beer: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkc Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 According to Genesis 1:20-22 the chicken came before the egg. :beer: :beer: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mullet Man Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 PROBLEM SOLVED :: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Duece Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 alot of animals have.... two eyes, one mouth, four legs, one heart, two lungs, hair, toenails, teeth, sex organs, kidneys, a liver, a nervous system, a brain, veins, skin, blood, two nostrils and a nose. thats a great point meat....the difference is an animal doesnt know its going to die...humans do........hence some kid named jesus enters the picture Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mullet Man Posted November 18, 2006 Report Share Posted November 18, 2006 thats a great point meat....the difference is an animal doesnt know its going to die...humans do........hence some kid named jesus enters the picture then why do Elephants shed tears? why do they bury their dead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts