warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 nothing because he was dead !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 nothing because he was dead !!! 519698[/snapback] Ok what about the minute before he died then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Ok what about the minute before he died then 519701[/snapback] I have no idea, cause I dont evan know how he died, but probally " well this feels wierd" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 I have no idea, cause I dont evan know how he died, but probally " well this feels wierd" 519704[/snapback] Evolution or creation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Evolution or creation? 519705[/snapback] Evolution!! The real deal is, bible thumpers wont believe what we can prove, and cant prove what they believe. Those are the facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 As Science Digest reported: "Scientists who utterly reject Evolution may be one of our fastest-growing controversial minorities... Many of the scientists supporting this position hold impressive credentials in science." 3 One example is the late Dr. Arthur E. Wilder-Smith, an honored scientist with an amazing three earned doctorates. He held many distinguished positions. 4 A former Evolutionist, Dr. Wilder-Smith debated various leading scientists on the subject throughout the world. In his opinion, the Evolution model did not fit as well with the established facts of science as did the Creation model of intelligent design. "The Evolutionary model says that it is not necessary to assume the existence of anything, besides matter and energy, to produce life. That proposition is unscientific. We know perfectly well that if you leave matter to itself, it does not organize itself - in spite of all the efforts in recent years to prove that it does." 5 Secular researcher Richard Milton summarized the current world situation: "Darwinism has never had much appeal for science outside of the English-speaking world, and has never appealed much to the American public (although popular with the U.S. scientific establishment in the past). However, its ascendancy in science, in both Britain and America, has been waning for several decades as its grip has weakened in successive areas: geology; paleontology; embryology; comparative anatomy. Now even geneticists are beginning to have doubts. It is only in mainstream molecular biology and zoology that Darwinism retains serious enthusiastic supporters. As growing numbers of scientists begin to drift away from neo-Darwinist ideas, the revision of Darwinism at the public level is long overdue, and is a process that I believe has already started." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Evolution!! 519706[/snapback] Nope Darwin rested his account of life's origins on the notion that God created one or a few life forms upon which natural selection could act Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 What did Darwin believe when he died? 519697[/snapback] I found it In his later years, Darwin was plagued by fatigue and intestinal sickness, thought by some historians to have been caused by Chagas' disease, contracted during his travels in South America. He died on April 19, 1882, and lies buried in Westminster Abbey. so he was probally think "OH SHIT" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 1. Is there evidence for evolution? In the 150 years since Darwin proposed the theory of evolution by natural selection, a mountain of evidence has accumulated to support the theory. A greatly expanded fossil record since Darwin's time, the discovery of DNA and the process of genetic replication, an understanding of radioactive decay, observations of natural selection in the wild and in laboratories, and evidence in the genomes of many different organisms, including humans, have all bolstered the validity of the theory of evolution. Learn More Evidence for Evolution 2. How can you know what happened millions of years ago if no one was there to see it? Evidence and observation are the building blocks of all scientific inquiry; evolutionary science is no different. Evidence in the form of the fossil record, geological formations, and genetics attest to change having taken place and give clues to how evolution works. The theory of evolution puts these clues together into a cohesive explanation of the diversity of living things. Like all theories, the theory of evolution relies on tangible evidence as well as inference for those things that can't be observed directly. It is important to remember that Earth itself contains evidence of life in the past, and that this evidence provides critical support for the theory of evolution. Learn More What Is Science? 3. Does the fossil record tell us the whole story? Opponents of evolution point to gaps in the fossil record as proof that the theory is invalid. They say the fossil record fails to show what are called "transitional forms," generally the in-between stages as one type of creature evolved into another. The fossil record certainly has gaps, mostly because the conditions required to create fossils have been rare ever since life began on Earth. A very small percentage of animals that have lived and died ever became fossils. Thus, many pieces of the puzzle are missing; some will never be found. Nonetheless, we have many, many fossils that illustrate evolutionary transitions between fish and amphibians, between reptiles and mammals, between dinosaurs and birds, and in many lineages such as whales and horses. And new fossils continue to reveal transitional forms that some said don't exist. Learn More What Killed the Dinosaurs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 Biologists consider the existence of biological evolution to be a fact. It can be demonstrated today and the historical evidence for its occurrence in the past is overwhelming. However, biologists readily admit that they are less certain of the exact mechanism of evolution; there are several theories of the mechanism of evolution. Stephen J. Gould has put this as well as anyone else: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 You are missing the point Warwgn Evolution to some extent is obvious but you can't evolve from nothing. although Darwin limits God to one or a few acts of creation, he still relies upon God to explain life's existence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 (edited) I found it In his later years, Darwin was plagued by fatigue and intestinal sickness, thought by some historians to have been caused by Chagas' disease, contracted during his travels in South America. He died on April 19, 1882, and lies buried in Westminster Abbey. so he was probally think "OH SHIT" Edited May 23, 2006 by PUSH THE THROTTLE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 You are missing the point Warwgn Evolution to some extent is obvious but you can't evolve from nothing. 519721[/snapback] no you are, I'm not saying why we evolved or how, just that we did. And we didnt evolve from nothing we came from something. I am saying adam didnt come from nothing and suddenly apear then have a rib taken out and then there was eve and we all came from that. That is retarted and there is not a shread of evidence to even make it seem remotely possible!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted May 23, 2006 Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 no you are, I'm not saying why we evolved or how, just that we did. And we didnt evolve from nothing we came from something. 519724[/snapback] I'm not the one who has based the fact God doesn't exist on the findings of somebody who based his research on the fact that God does exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
warwgn Posted May 23, 2006 Author Report Share Posted May 23, 2006 There is no proof that god does exist! I find it unlikely, but that is just opinion, I'm talking facts only. It does not matter what Darwin belived, but it is the facts that have been revaled since he formed his theory that are important. And there is no facts to support GOD as a real thing that had any effect on life at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts