PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 I know what you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 first of all, the jury wasnt hung. the lawyer on the jury who was the jury foreman, wasnt allowing anyone to vote during the deliberation and was 'retrying' the case in the jury room, holding up the whole damn process. one got replaced for doing outside research, and one got replaced because he requested to be replaced. secondly, amber didnt know scott was married until she saw scott on the news when his wife went missing. third, weights could hold down a body, even with gases building up, for four months, and connor was found outside the body because eventually, after death, a pregnant body will expel the fetus on its own. the debris found around his neck was just tha, debris from the ocean. and they werent found "right next to each other". back before dna, circumstantial evidence had to be the best option in many cases where bodies were hidden well and crime was covered up well. just cause he was able to kill her wihout leaving a bloody mess and dump the body long enough to hide cause of death, doesnt mean he should get away with it. its called common sense. try it on for size. i think the dots in this 'circumstantial' case were real close together, didnt take much to figure it all out. like i said before, fuck scott peterson, and fuck anyone who supports him, or thinks he didnt get his fair day in court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Gotta appreciate how Brooke pays attention. amber didnt know scott was married until she saw scott on the news when his wife went missing. I still think she Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 i think she was conned by scott just like everyone else. she wasnt the first woman he'd had an affair with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PUSH THE THROTTLE Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 i think she was conned by scott just like everyone else. she wasnt the first woman he'd had an affair with. 293595[/snapback] As I said all I really know about the case was Laci was missing, Scott fished in the same spot the body was found, Scott had an affair, Scott talked about her being gone before the body was found, Scott was found guilty, Scott sentenced to death. Point taken on her being conned. I still don Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redlined Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 (edited) And just for the record, I couldn Edited December 15, 2004 by Redlined Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Posted December 15, 2004 Report Share Posted December 15, 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireman-hott Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 third, weights could hold down a body, even with gases building up, for four months, and connor was found outside the body because eventually, after death, a pregnant body will expel the fetus on its own. the debris found around his neck was just tha, debris from the ocean. and they werent found "right next to each other". No Brooke it wouldn't have held the body down for 4 months not gonna happen. In less than 4 months on land the body would have been all skeleton. Figure the time that fish and bacteria in the water alot of the body should have been eaten away. And according to the "leaked" autopsy report of the baby it was tape, duct tape if I remember correctly. back before dna, circumstantial evidence had to be the best option in many cases where bodies were hidden well and crime was covered up well. just cause he was able to kill her wihout leaving a bloody mess and dump the body long enough to hide cause of death, doesnt mean he should get away with it. its called common sense. try it on for size. No if they couldn't tie somoene to a murder the case was lost. circumstantial holds way more merit in this case than it would in any other case because of the media. The media literally hung him before Laci's body was even found. Something doesn't add up though, how could they not determin the cause of death. If she was stabbed/shot there is a crime scene SOMEWHERE with blood. If she was strangled the little bone in the neck, it alludes my memory atm, would have been broken from the pressure. Blunt forces trauma to the head the skull would have been fucked up. Oh and whoever said the concrete thing, people do make anchors for boats out of concrete. My mothers side is hillbillys and more than once I've seen them fishing on boats and using bricks and homemade anchors for anchors. I feel had this not made it to the media he would have walked. I may be waaaay off though seeing as how much of the trial was sealed maybe there is some group of evidence somewhere that ties it all together perfectly. Maybe theres not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 yes, too bad her head wasnt found or they could have known whether she was strangled or beaten. dont speak so confidently when you dont have a clue. its really annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fireman-hott Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 And telling me to fuck off because I question wether there was an real evidence in the trial is really annoying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooke Posted December 16, 2004 Report Share Posted December 16, 2004 lmfao Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.