Jump to content

A Simple Queation Im Sure We All Wondered...


Dragg-on

Recommended Posts

No timing, no distributor, none of that made a difference when Yamaha engineers made their decision. They could have programmed whatevrr they wanted for timing into the CDI. The deciding factor here is cost. Simplicity and cost effectiveness were the ultimate factors in the single coil system that the banshee uses. When one cylinder is at TDC, the other is at BDC. When the cylinder that is up fires, the cylinder that is down gets a useless spark. There are 2 timing marks on the flywheel. It is cheaper and cost effective to run one coil, and have the cylinder at BDC spark a useless spark than to have a two coil, two pickup setup on the bike. You could eliminate the useless spark with a custom ignition-(CDI) and another pickup coil that is 180 degrees from the original. You would also need another coil, along with a single timing "mark" on the flywheel. But, the system works fine, unlike some other Yamaha systems, (TORS) lol. Anyways, that's the jist of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thecabinboy If the double spark is true then your animation is wrong.

Like NYUK said, but also notice its CASE INDUCTED which is kinda cool I think, and it appears to have the jugs on "backwards" from the typical engine, except for the now dead Cannondale, but it was a 4 stroke, so it doesn't even matter really. Personally I think case inducted, with the exhaust shooting towards the rear rather than a ram horn type of exhaust, would prove to be more efficient. The only problem with the carbs on the case is they are inches from the ground, rocks, sand ect, and if you just turned the jugs around they carbs would be into your radiator.

Just thought I'd elaborate. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and it appears to have the jugs on "backwards" from the typical engine

 

Not so. Actually, if the jugs were on backwards, the exhaust would come out the same side as the carbs. Which, may be something to try.

 

Personally I think case inducted, with the exhaust shooting towards the rear rather than a ram horn type of exhaust, would prove to be more efficient. The only problem with the carbs on the case is they are inches from the ground, rocks, sand ect

 

How about a Crankenstein?????? Carbs in the front, exhaust straight out the rear. Kind of like Jethro's mullet. Business in the front, and pleasure in the rear? Reminds me of that anal post in Roostin' room. Maybe jethro can get "in" on that? Anyways, it would seem thoughtful that a straight exhaust would be better and more efficient. This would be a question for Sainty. Except, he doesn't post here anymore unfortunately. Case induction rocks!!!! Rotax rotary valved, case inducted banshee tranny mounted fire breathing nitro powered monster!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a Crankenstein??????  Carbs in the front, exhaust straight out the rear.

 

I saw a Crankenstein motor at Little Sahara many years ago that was setup that way. It was a snowmobile topend grafted onto a Banshee tranny. It was fast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about a Crankenstein??????  Carbs in the front, exhaust straight out the rear.

 

I saw a Crankenstein motor at Little Sahara many years ago that was setup that way. It was a snowmobile topend grafted onto a Banshee tranny. It was fast!

THOSE ARE SICK!!!!

 

If you have the $$$ to buy one of those I don't think you're gonna care if your pods are inches from the sand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...