Jump to content

My Build Thread, Redline 10mil Super Serval Cub on 110.


Recommended Posts

Have you already dynoed both? And was the LED set custom?

 

We never ran LED on it.

 

But my stamped Sniper in-frames made more/better power than your god's out-frame pipes.

 

In addition, this notion that a "custom" pipe always out performs the shelf pipes is incorrect.

 

I've seen it first hand.

 

Hopefully control's new LEDs make good power, but I would not be surprised if the Snipers make just as good if not better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to see where the power comes on and starts to fall off with all the pipes. Not so much as how much it makes nor how flat the tq curve is. I really didnt expect a serval to pull over 10k rpms. I like being wrong lol.

 

I think it would take about a 800-1000rpm change where the powerband starts to come on for me to consider changing pipes. And considering i dont even know how that would feel, im need to stop typing. I dont understand power curves on a dyno vs seat if the pants feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We never ran LED on it.

 

But my stamped Sniper in-frames made more/better power than your god's out-frame pipes.

 

In addition, this notion that a "custom" pipe always out performs the shelf pipes is incorrect.

 

I've seen it first hand.

 

Hopefully control's new LEDs make good power, but I would not be surprised if the Snipers make just as good if not better.

 

 

A custom pipe, using precise engine build parameters along with some testing should be better than any off the shelf stamped pipe. If is is not, it needs to be re-evaluated and maybe some of the parameters were not taken into consideration. A custom pipe should have a better power delivery in the intended rpm range as it provides a stronger return sound wave (and pressure) back into the combustion chamber before the exhaust port closes on the way to TDC. Some of the flaws in how an engine makes power I believe can be fixed with a correct pipe. A pipe is not really a one size fits all. It can work well within a range of engine parameters (ignition timing, compression, port timings, blow down, intended rpm range, rpm drop between shifts, estimated operating temperature, etc, etc) but not be optimum for any particular engine.

 

I don't think any pipe builder would dispute this. In the real world when testing there may be some unknown, unforseen variables to deal with, and that is where the cut, weld, and retry method may come into play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A custom pipe, using precise engine build parameters along with some testing should be better than any off the shelf stamped pipe. If is is not, it needs to be re-evaluated and maybe some of the parameters were not taken into consideration. A custom pipe should have a better power delivery in the intended rpm range as it provides a stronger return sound wave (and pressure) back into the combustion chamber before the exhaust port closes on the way to TDC. Some of the flaws in how an engine makes power I believe can be fixed with a correct pipe. A pipe is not really a one size fits all. It can work well within a range of engine parameters (ignition timing, compression, port timings, blow down, intended rpm range, rpm drop between shifts, estimated operating temperature, etc, etc) but not be optimum for any particular engine.

 

I don't think any pipe builder would dispute this. In the real world when testing there may be some unknown, unforseen variables to deal with, and that is where the cut, weld, and retry method may come into play.

Thought u jus a parts changer lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A custom pipe, using precise engine build parameters along with some testing should be better than any off the shelf stamped pipe. If is is not, it needs to be re-evaluated and maybe some of the parameters were not taken into consideration. A custom pipe should have a better power delivery in the intended rpm range as it provides a stronger return sound wave (and pressure) back into the combustion chamber before the exhaust port closes on the way to TDC. Some of the flaws in how an engine makes power I believe can be fixed with a correct pipe. A pipe is not really a one size fits all. It can work well within a range of engine parameters (ignition timing, compression, port timings, blow down, intended rpm range, rpm drop between shifts, estimated operating temperature, etc, etc) but not be optimum for any particular engine.

 

I don't think any pipe builder would dispute this. In the real world when testing there may be some unknown, unforseen variables to deal with, and that is where the cut, weld, and retry method may come into play.

I don't necessarily disagree with you.

 

I'm just saying I've seen the custom ones not work as well as hoped.

 

When the new DM pipes (big DMs) came out I spent the money up front to get a set and have them tested. They weren't as good then as they are now. Improvements were made based on what Cameron saw on the dyno. That info was relayed to Arlan.

 

My inframe DM pipes were the first set built. I took a gamble. It worked out. I know he's using feedback from at least Cameron and likely Art as well.

 

As good as the pipe builders are, they still rely on the real world or dyno testing to get them perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...