BANSHEE HP Posted September 15, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2015 Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banshee den Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 Have you done any testing on 4mm yet lately? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANSHEE HP Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 There's a shop that has a set and they got 81hp and 46tq. I'm pretty sure they've made changes and are in the 87hp range now. We'll be building 392 and 421 cc engines next month. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banshee den Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 ok sweet. definitely interested in these cylinders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mailman Posted September 19, 2015 Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 How did these numbers compare to the cub cylinders that you had? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANSHEE HP Posted September 19, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2015 2hp more than my cub last September. Same pipes, carbs and lower end. I meant to get a picture of the graphs but forgot today, I'll try to remember tomorrow. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strm Trpr Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 What is the smallest 4mil topend you guys plan on selling. My motor is a stock bolt on motor and I can burn a full tank of fuel on one ride. Any bigger and fuel economy is going to suck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANSHEE HP Posted September 20, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 66mm bore Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strm Trpr Posted September 20, 2015 Report Share Posted September 20, 2015 66mm bore So, 397cc's, that's cool!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANSHEE HP Posted September 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 How did these numbers compare to the cub cylinders that you had? BLUE was my 465 cub sept '14 RED is my Driveline Performance 465 sept '15 The only differences on the entire bike configuration were cylinders of course and last year I ran a 19/38 so it did mph better, this year I used 18/38. I did have that cub make 116hp before but I cant find graphs from 2010/11. Ive always want to hit 120hp with inframe pipes, I came close with the cub and I'm certain I'll get there with these. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil Doobie420 Posted September 21, 2015 Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 Titties Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleeper06 Posted September 21, 2015 Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 As cast, or ported Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANSHEE HP Posted September 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 Both ported Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strm Trpr Posted September 21, 2015 Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 How long before the 66mm pistons and LP +4mm cylinders are ready? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BANSHEE HP Posted September 21, 2015 Author Report Share Posted September 21, 2015 We're finishing a big run of domes right now before the trip. When we get home we'll be cutting cylinders all October. Right now we have plated 68mm cylinders on the shelf. We have pistons for the 66mm bores already. I would say by the end of October we'll have 66 & 68 in all the strokes raw unplated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.