You are obviously a die hard republican. Reagan and Bush did good and Clinton reaped the rewards, thats what your saying. Not really true, but you would argue it is, just like a die hard republican
Basic poli-sci:
Republican: For statis quo, keep the rich, rich, and the poor, poor. Big on Military
Democrat: Help the poor, even if you hurt the rich. Cut Military.
(yes I know those are very basic ideals)
Now, obviously we can't have it completly either way, thats why this country is great. Sometimes we have republicans, sometimes democrats. Hopefuly it all evens out at the end. What would be best? a Moderate?
Clinton was much closer a moderate than Bush is, hell, Bush sr. was closer a moderate. The problems with this Bush will not come as rewards to the next president, (I'm not talking about the economy here) but as problems to US as Americans.
So those of you who reap the benifits of this extra spending (ships, planes, tanks), I'm happy for you, I know you'll be voting for Bush. But i don't think the people who lost their jobs as of late will see it you're way.
And will you please explain to everyone how "raising taxes" helps the economy.